Everything Apple Watch Pro needs to beat Garmin and Samsung

2022 is an enormous 12 months for smartwatches. Samsung simply refreshed its Galaxy Watch lineup with a brand new “Professional” mannequin, Google is lastly releasing a Pixel Watch, Qualcomm launched a new wearable chip, and a few Put on OS 2 watches will lastly get the upgrade to Wear OS 3. And over in Apple’s camp, the Apple Watch lineup is about to see its largest overhaul in years. This 12 months, we’re anticipating to see not one, not two, however potentially three new Apple Watch models. A brand new Sequence 8, a brand new SE, and a never-before-seen rugged “Professional” mannequin — a brand new high-end possibility that would probably shake issues up within the smartwatch world.

That’s as a result of an Apple Watch Professional would imply Apple’s coming into an entire new wearable class: multisport health watches. It is a class with passionate customers who demand a particular checklist of health and navigation options to gasoline their athletic adventures, probably placing the Apple Watch as much as challenges it hasn’t confronted earlier than.

Health watches are a distinct segment dominated by manufacturers like Garmin, Polar, and Coros. These manufacturers concentrate on units that may take a beating in all components, final for weeks on a single cost, supply superior navigational options, and provides customers dozens upon dozens of efficiency metrics to obsessively analyze. Newer fashions function multi-band GPS in order that customers can get a sign in even essentially the most distant locales.

It’s an fascinating pivot for Apple, which already dominates the general smartwatch market. Nonetheless, whereas multisport watches largely enchantment to a distinct segment crowd, it’s a loyal crowd. Not like people who solely have interaction in informal exercises to remain lively, these are devoted athletes who make investments quite a lot of money and time into coaching. They’re unlikely to depart their sports activities watches to gather mud in a drawer for months on finish. Flagship GPS watches just like the Garmin Fenix 7 begin at round $700 and might price as a lot as $1,000 for essentially the most superior fashions. That’s a profitable marketplace for Apple to enter.

It’s additionally a departure from what Apple’s smartwatches are primarily recognized for. The Apple Watch is understood for its superior well being options, superior connectivity, seamless integration with iPhones, and, to be frank, middling battery life. It’s extra of a mini laptop than a devoted coaching device. That presents some alternatives, but in addition challenges if Apple needs the “Professional” watch to succeed.

To win over the Garmin crowd, Apple goes to wish a watch with higher battery life, superior sturdiness, improved bodily controls, and help for restoration metrics to assist with coaching. If Apple can pull that off, it has the flexibility to reshape what a “conventional” smartwatch can do within the health house. Improvements right here would possibly truly result in a sophisticated sports activities watch that doesn’t make customers select between health and smarts.

Picture by Vjeran Pavic / The Verge

Essentially the most evident difficulty for Apple to deal with is battery life. Since day one, Apple hasn’t veered from the 18-hour battery life estimate for its smartwatches. In actuality, you may get extra relying in your utilization — on some fashions, I’ve gone so long as 36 hours earlier than needing to cost. However 36 hours nonetheless isn’t weeks of battery life. Once I examined the Garmin Fenix 7S, I obtained two weeks on a single cost. I obtained every week on the Polar Grit X Pro, and the Coros Vertix 2 has an estimated 60 days of on a regular basis use. (After two weeks of testing the Vertix 2, I nonetheless had 85 % battery left.) I’ll be genuinely shocked if the Apple Watch Professional will get anyplace close to every week, nevertheless it has to do higher than 36 hours to really be a multiday watch. As an illustration, in testing I’ve gotten about 48–60 hours on the Galaxy Watch 5 Professional. It falls wanting a Garmin or Polar, nevertheless it’s a begin.

As for sturdiness, I’ve by no means damaged an Apple Watch earlier than — and I’m a klutz. Nonetheless, I’ve gotten nicks and scratches with regular put on and tear on nearly all my Apple Watches. (Together with extra sturdy fashions, just like the Sequence 7!) In case you’re going to take a watch working on a dusty path, whitewater rafting, kiteboarding, snowboarding, or what have you ever, you need to know that sweat, grime, mud, water, sand, and the weather aren’t a problem. A few of this can be a notion difficulty. You possibly can swim with an Apple Watch and sturdiness has improved since earlier fashions, nevertheless it simply doesn’t give the impression that it’s robust.

Then there’s the matter of controls. I’ve already written about why physical buttons are essential for athletes, however counting on touchscreens is a possible dealbreaker. Moist fingers make swiping a chore, the digital crown isn’t immune from unintentional presses, and the facet button, whereas superb for glossy minimalism, just isn’t nice if you’re carrying gloves for cold-weather sports activities. These controls are nice for every day life, however they’re not fairly as dependable as Garmin or Polar’s five-button navigation system for actions. And whereas Siri is useful, it’s not at all times an possibility in loud environments or when it’s worthwhile to be discreet. As an illustration, utilizing Siri was moot after I was working a half-marathon. The cheering crowds and loudspeakers rendered any instructions inaudible.

Picture by Victoria Music / The Verge

Apple can be nonetheless behind in relation to sure monitoring metrics. Restoration and harm prevention have been a sizzling pattern in health tech lately and that’s an space the place Apple hasn’t executed a lot. Not solely was it late to native sleep monitoring, it’s nonetheless a reasonably primary function within the watchOS 9 beta. The watch additionally doesn’t supply a lot perception into how effectively you’ve recovered from bodily pressure.

As an alternative, Apple’s centered extra on customers closing their rings. That always results in prioritizing streaks at the expense of rest — which anybody who significantly trains for occasions will let you know is a big no-no. If it needs to win over severe athletes, the Professional goes to wish much less gamification and extra flexibility. That mentioned, having examined the watchOS 9 beta, I’m not too involved in regards to the exercise metrics entrance. When you don’t get as a lot element as a Garmin or Polar watch, watchOS 9 provides some mandatory fundamentals like coronary heart fee zones, customized exercises, working type metrics, and elevation charts.

These are all massive challenges for Apple’s new watch, however there are additionally massive alternatives right here. Multisport watches are typically weak on good options like music streaming, digital assistants, management of good dwelling tech, contactless funds, LTE connectivity for emergency SOS calls, fall detection, and superior well being options like atrial fibrillation alerts. Garmin is the very best of the lot, however its variations of those options usually have caveats. Security options rely in your cellphone being close by, the apps in its Join IQ retailer aren’t as much as snuff, including music will be finicky, and Garmin Pay is restricted to your watch. It’s arguably simpler for Apple to enhance its health options, battery, and sturdiness than for Garmin and Polar to beef up their good capabilities.

Picture by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Apple isn’t the one one going Professional this summer season. Samsung additionally simply launched the Galaxy Watch 5 Professional, which is also aimed toward outside lovers. And whereas it improves battery and sturdiness, it’s nonetheless missing in dependable bodily controls and coaching restoration metrics. (Plus, its turn-by-turn navigation leaves out runners.) Principally, it’s an admirable first try however there are positively areas the place Samsung can enhance. I think about the Apple Watch Professional could be related — a primary try that tries to nail the fundamentals, whereas leaving room for extra thrilling options down the road.

None of us have seen the Professional — or no matter it finally ends up being known as — but. There may very effectively be new design components or beefier specs that may deal with not less than a few of these challenges. That mentioned, it’s uncommon that any firm knocks it out of the park with a primary try. The Apple Watch itself didn’t actually hit its stride till the Sequence 4. It’s unlikely that the primary Professional will lead a horde of Garmin lovers to immediately ditch their beloved Fenix and Forerunner watches. That’s additionally not how anybody ought to consider its “success.” For this primary rugged Apple Watch, it’ll be way more essential that it does fundamentals effectively sufficient to take advantage of diehard Garmin and Polar loyalists curious.